Calibration Executive for Traditional DAQ

Content Type
Programming Language
Current manual

Measurement Uncertainty for NI E Series Devices

Measurement Uncertainty for NI E Series Devices

The components of uncertainty vary depending on which test is running. The E Series device calibration procedure runs up to three main tests, depending on which device you are calibrating. Each test takes different uncertainty components into account. After Calibration Executive calculates all the components of uncertainty, the components are converted to a 1-sigma normal distribution, then combined using the root-sum-square method. The combined standard uncertainty is then multiplied by an appropriate coverage factor, taking degrees of freedom into account, to arrive at the reported expanded uncertainty of measurement, which corresponds to a coverage probability of approximately 95%.

Counter Uncertainty

This section describes the components of counter uncertainty in the E Series device calibration procedure. You must manually calculate final expanded counter uncertainty at a 95% confidence level based on the manufacturer’s specifications for the counter and your own Type A calculations. Enter this value when the procedure prompts you for it. A suggested final expanded uncertainty value is computed as follows:

where

where 10 is the number of measurements taken.

Type B uncertainty can be calculated as shown in the following example, which measures a 5 MHz square wave signal (which has negligible trigger error) with a one second gate time. This example is for an HP53132A counter with a high-stability oven that was calibrated three days ago.

where

Number of Samples is 200,000 (because frequency > 200 kHz)

Gate Time is 1 second

Time Base Error is Temp. Stability × (3 Days × Daily Aging Rate)

tacc is the timebase accuracy of the counter (from the hardware documentation)

tjitter is the jitter specification of the counter (from the hardware documentation)

tres is the rms resolution of the counter (from the hardware documentation)

= 2.5 × 10–9 + 3 × (5 × 10–10)

= 4.0 × 10–9

= [±4.0 × 10–9 ± 1.96 × (2.01 × 10–12 + 3 × 10–12)] × 5 MHz

= (±4.0 × 10–9 ±9.8 × 10–12) × 5 MHz

= ±20.05 mHz

Analog Input Uncertainty

The following table contains the names and descriptions of the components of analog input uncertainty in the E Series device calibration procedure.

Uncertainty Component Description
Calibrator uncertaintyRetrieved from the calibrator uncertainty text file.
Resolution uncertainty of the E Series device

where Resolution of DUT is the range of the E Series device divided by the number of levels in the ADC. The term in the denominator results from assuming a rectangular distribution of probabilities of the measurement values.
Type A uncertainty

where 10,000 is the number of measurements taken.

Leads, wiring, and calibration fixture Insignificant compared with other uncertainty components.

Analog Output Uncertainty

The following table contains the names and descriptions of the components of analog output uncertainty in the E Series device Calibration Executive procedure.

Uncertainty Component Description
DMM uncertaintyRetrieved from the DMM uncertainty text file.
Resolution uncertainty of the E Series device

where Resolution of DUT is the range of the E Series device divided by the number of levels in the digital-to-analog-converter (DAC). The term in the denominator results from assuming a rectangular distribution of probabilities of the measurement values.

Type A uncertainty

where 10 is the number of measurements taken and 1.06 accounts for the t-distribution.

Leads, wiring, and calibration fixture Insignificant compared with other uncertainty components.
NOTE icon Note   If you use the recommended test equipment and follow the test conditions guidelines, the vast majority of the uncertainty for the analog input tests is due to the resolution uncertainty of the ADC on the E Series device. The majority of the uncertainty for the analog output tests is due to the resolution uncertainty of the DAC on the E Series device. Other uncertainty components are negligible compared to these components.
Was this information helpful?